Standardising across the divisions on five results will require better finishes and higher points to be achieved to gain promotion.
It is intended that the threshold be increased proportionately with minor rounding to fifty points. Note that the rule changes below will be affected by the motion above. (Page 58)
B4.3.2 All Kayak Classes:
Division 3 to Division 2: on gaining 3300 4150 points from the best four five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
Division 2 to Division 1: on gaining 3600 4500 points from the best four five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
Division 1 to Premier: on gaining 4750 points from the best five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
B4.3.3 Canadian Men Singles
Division 3 to Division 2: on gaining 3200 4000 points from the best four five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
Division 2 to Division 1: on gaining 3400 4250 points from the best four events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
Division 1 to Premier: on gaining 4650 points from the best five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
B4.3.4 Canadian Women Singles
Division 3 to Division 2: on gaining 3200 4000 points from the best four five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
Division 2 to Premier / 1: on gaining 3400 4250 points from the best four five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
B4.3.5 Canadian Doubles
Division 2/3 to Premier/1: on gaining 2650 3350 points from the best four five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events
B4.4 End of season results
Ranking positions are calculated on the
• Best five results, in Premier, Division 1 and Division P/1
• Best four results in Divisions 2, 3 and 2/3
• Division 4 competitors are not ranked.
In the event of a tie, refer to Rules A6 (Championship Tie break) or B3.2 (Ranking Tie Break).
(Page 58)
B5.5.1 Division 2/Division 3
Ranking positions at the end of the season are calculated on the best four five results obtained in any Ranking Competitions in the season, at the divisional level declared by the Veteran or higher up to and including Division 2
6.7 Rank All Divisions/Classes Based On The Best 5 Results
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
- Location: Peterborough
- Contact:
6.7 Rank All Divisions/Classes Based On The Best 5 Results
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
-
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 2:00 pm
Re: 6.7 Rank All Divisions / Classes Based Upon The Best Fiv
Subject to Motion 6.6 this will need an amendment to allow for splitting C1W at Div 1/Prem, should you publish an alternate amendment to be taken in the event 6.6 is successful and hence Proxy Votes may be valid. ![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
- Location: Peterborough
- Contact:
Re: 6.7 Rank All Divisions/Classes Based On The Best 5 Resul
As 6.6 and 6.7 are inter related and affect the same rules which ever is first may have an affect in the second.
If 6.6 is passed B4.3.3 will refer to Canadian Singles, B43..4 will have been removed, and B4.3.6 will have been renumbered before we get here. The rule changes will then be amended to reflect the motion.
The purpose of the motion will remain unchanged.
If 6.6 is passed B4.3.3 will refer to Canadian Singles, B43..4 will have been removed, and B4.3.6 will have been renumbered before we get here. The rule changes will then be amended to reflect the motion.
The purpose of the motion will remain unchanged.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Re: 6.7 Rank All Divisions/Classes Based On The Best 5 Resul
Two quick points:
1. Kayak promotion from D3 to D2 will require an average of 830 points rather than the 825 now; and C2 D2/3 to Prem/1 will require 670 average rather than 662.5. All other classes and divisions appear unchanged. Was this specifically considered in setting out the proposals?
2. The syntax of the wording
Just thinking.........
1. Kayak promotion from D3 to D2 will require an average of 830 points rather than the 825 now; and C2 D2/3 to Prem/1 will require 670 average rather than 662.5. All other classes and divisions appear unchanged. Was this specifically considered in setting out the proposals?
2. The syntax of the wording
suggests 3 different, separate ways of achieving promotion. In reality, the 2nd & 3rd can be combined; so would it help make things clearer if the 2nd "or" were changed to "and"?from the best five events or a combination of maximum points or achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events.
Just thinking.........
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
- Location: Peterborough
- Contact:
Re: 6.7 Rank All Divisions/Classes Based On The Best 5 Resul
Hiding to nothing here. If we extended the motion to ' "a combination of maximum points and achieving the ‘paddle up standard’ at three events", someone would read this that you have to win AND beat 40% of the division above. So winning three div 3 events at division 3/4 events would not count (you did not get the paddle up standard).
If the motion relating to paddle up = 1,000 points is upheld, then the "achieving the ‘paddle up standard’" could be removed completely.
If the motion relating to paddle up = 1,000 points is upheld, then the "achieving the ‘paddle up standard’" could be removed completely.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
- Location: Peterborough
- Contact:
Re: 6.7 Rank All Divisions/Classes Based On The Best 5 Resul
The motion was accepted nem con.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points