6.7 Inquorate Div 4

General slalom chatter...rant about the bad, rave about the good
Post Reply
Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

6.7 Inquorate Div 4

Post by Canadian Paddler » Sat Nov 04, 2017 3:56 pm

6.7 Inquorate Div 4
There have been events this year where division 4 has been inquorate, but individual paddlers would have finished well up the Division 3 results. As the event was inquorate the paddlers involved were not promoted. Some have used this to apply for ranking status, some have been just ranked in division three by the organiser (there is no allowance for this in the rules).
We want to encourage people to stay in or take up the sport, and not recognising their obvious standard of paddling is counter-productive. This motion offers a way to promote paddlers that are obviously of division 3 standard regardless of whether the division 4 is quorate Page 57
B4.3.1 Promotion from Division 4 to Division 3
For Division 4 an event is deemed to be quorate if 3 or more competitors start. (See Rule UKC5.1)
All Events: 1 in 5 (or part thereof if quorate)
OR if their score is better than that of a competitor awarded more than 100 points in the corresponding division 3 event
If an Event is not quorate, then Competitors are promoted if their score would have gained promotion when compared to another quorate event as follows:
- C1M/C2/K1W: if they would have been promoted in the K1M event.
- C1W: if they would have been promoted in either the K1W or K1M event.
In all cases where two, or more, paddlers are tied on best run scores for the last promotion place from Division 4 then all such Competitors are promoted.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Re: 6.7 Inquorate Div 4

Post by Canadian Paddler » Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:29 pm

The motion was accepted, nem can.

With the committee urged to review the situation for inqurotae stand alone K1M competitions.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

Post Reply