5.21 Slalom Regulations - 2011 ACM Motions

General slalom chatter...rant about the bad, rave about the good
Post Reply
Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Post by Canadian Paddler » Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:54 pm

This meeting authorises the slalom committee to review and redraft the slalom regulations to remove inconsistency and duplication, and to make the regulations more readily understandable as circulated just prior to the ACM, incorporating any changes need to support the BCU data protection regulations.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Post by Canadian Paddler » Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:55 pm

Simplified regs not circulated yet... Watch this space :)
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

djberriman
Posts: 806
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:19 pm

Post by djberriman » Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:38 pm

Any chance you could put something in about temporary bib numbers?

UK C17.3.1 For individual events, except Division 4, Competitors are
identified by numbered bibs supplied by the Slalom Committee
(or an approved sponsor), as described in the ‘Bib
Arrangements’ section. ONLY THE BIBS SUPPLIED MAY
BE USED. Where a Competitor is permitted to compete
without a bib, the procedure for Division 4 (UK.C17.3.2
below) must be followed.

Add something like 'the number must not replicate any currently allocated bib for that division"

Which basically means use very high numbers or at least make sure the results show that.

Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Post by Canadian Paddler » Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:23 pm

Cannot do this as it is a change to the sense of the rules. This would have to be a motion, and ciculated to the clubs in advance. Sorry
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

Mark Shaw
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:13 pm
Location: Lancaster

Post by Mark Shaw » Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:02 pm

Surely this isn't changing a rule as such but just providing guidance to organisers when they are following the existing rule. If the existing rule doesn't need to change then why can't this guidance be provided under the heading of "making the regulations more readily understandable"?
The above is the personal opinion of Mark Shaw and does not reflect the views of either the BCU or England Slalom Committees.

djberriman
Posts: 806
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:19 pm

Post by djberriman » Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:42 pm

or supporting BCU data protection rules .... accurate data held on an individual?

Post Reply