ACM Motion 6.16 Rule 34.1 Boats to finals - 'Just for Fun, to see what people think'

General slalom chatter...rant about the bad, rave about the good
Post Reply

ACM Motion 6.16 Rule 34.1 Boats to finals - 'Just for Fun, to see what people think'

For the Motion
14
93%
Against the Motion
0
No votes
Abstain
1
7%
Amend
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 15

Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Post by Canadian Paddler » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:25 am

Amend Rule 34.1 so that rather than a number (p) of boats to go to semi finals/finals, to be published in advance, the numbers in the finals are fixed:
>46 = 40
35-45 = 30
25-34 = 20
20-24 = 15
<20 = 10

With 10 going on to final.

Plus remove restriction on no more than 6 changes in course.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

Nick Penfold
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:21 pm

Post by Nick Penfold » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:03 pm

Good move. Lines us up with internationals.

Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Post by Canadian Paddler » Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:11 pm

Passed, after discussion and splitting into two parts, each part being passed in the end
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

66-1146487544

Post by 66-1146487544 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:11 pm

CP, I'm pretty certain that the removal of the restriction on no more than 6 changes in a course was passed but thought that the number of boats to go to semi finals/finals was left as it is, as S&S had an issue with water time at the Paul McCankey which is one of the few Prem events that uses this race format. Was this not the case or was I in a different meeting?

Canadian Paddler
Posts: 1480
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
Location: Peterborough
Contact:

Post by Canadian Paddler » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:00 pm

Removal of minimum number of changes accepted nem con (no one said no)

Amendment to specify number getting promoted failed with 7 votes for specifying the number of paddlers progressing and 36 votes against with 8 abstentions. The motion duly failed.

Thank you, someone was awake, Sorry to mislead you all :blush:
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points

Post Reply